Comparisons
Certvian vs. Gigaforce: Comparing Subrogation Approaches
A fair comparison of Certvian and Gigaforce for subrogation, a focused email-native product versus a dedicated subrogation platform, and who each suits.
5 min readUpdated July 27, 2026
Both are subrogation-focused, which makes the comparison more about model than scope. Gigaforce is a dedicated subrogation and claims platform; Certvian is an email-native product designed to reconstruct and cite a case from a forwarded claim with no integration. Here's how they differ.
| Certvian | Gigaforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Email-native: forward a claim thread, get a cited case back | Dedicated subrogation/claims platform |
| Onboarding | No integration project, working in minutes | Platform onboarding |
| Emphasis | Grounded, cited output with human-gated outbound | End-to-end subrogation workflow for carriers & TPAs |
| Best fit | Teams wanting fast start and evidence-first output | Teams adopting a full subrogation platform |
| Also offers | Recovery Services (files worked for you) | Platform-centric offering |
How to choose
If you want to adopt a comprehensive subrogation platform and are ready to onboard onto one, a dedicated platform like Gigaforce is worth evaluating. If your priority is starting fast (forwarding real claims and getting back a reconstructed, cited case without a rollout) and you want every AI statement grounded and human-approved, that's the gap Certvian is built for.
Is Certvian a Gigaforce alternative?+
Yes, for teams that prefer an email-native, evidence-first approach over onboarding to a full platform. Both are subrogation-focused; the main difference is how you adopt them and how the AI's output is grounded and approved.
See it on one of your own claims.
Bring a claim file and we’ll run Certvian’s analysis live: chronology, liability, recovery viability, the drafted demand.
Request a walkthrough